CACI VF-300 Breach of Contract
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI
VF-300 Breach of Contract
We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:
1.Did [name of plaintiff] and [name of defendant] enter into a contract?
Yes No
If your answer to question 1 is yes, then answer question 2. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
[2.Did [name of plaintiff] do all, or substantially all, of the significant things that the contract required [him/her/nonbinary pronoun/it] to do?
Yes No
If your answer to question 2 is yes, [skip question 3 and] answer question 4. If you answered no, [answer question 3 if excuse is at issue/stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form].]
[3.Was [name of plaintiff] excused from having to do all, or substantially all, of the significant things that the contract required [him/her/nonbinary pronoun/it] to do?
Yes No
If your answer to question 3 is yes, then answer question 4. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.]
[4.Did all the conditions that were required for [name of defendant]’s performance occur?
Yes No
If your answer to question 4 is yes, [skip question 5 and] answer question 6. If you answered no, [answer question 5 if waiver or excuse is at issue/stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form].]
[5.Were the required conditions that did not occur [excused/waived]?
Yes No
If your answer to question 5 is yes, then answer question 6. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.]
6.[Did [name of defendant] fail to do something that the contract required [him/her/nonbinary pronoun/it] to do?
Yes No]
[or]
[Did [name of defendant] do something that the contract prohibited [him/her/nonbinary pronoun/it] from doing?
Yes No]
If your answer to [either option for] question 6 is yes, then answer question 7. If you answered no [to both options], stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
7.Was [name of plaintiff] harmed by [name of defendant]’s breach of contract?
Yes No
If your answer to question 7 is yes, then answer question 8. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
8.What are [name of plaintiff]’s damages?
[a.Past [economic] loss [including [insert
descriptions of claimed damages]]: $]
[b.Future [economic] loss [including [insert
descriptions of claimed damages]]: $]
TOTAL $
After [this verdict form has/all verdict forms have] been signed, notify the [clerk/bailiff/court attendant] that you are ready to present your verdict in the courtroom.
New April 2004; Revised December 2010, June 2011, June 2013, June 2015, May 2020
https://crowdsourcelawyers.com/judicial-council-california-civil-jury-instructions-caci
Directions for Use
This verdict form is based on CACI No. 303, Breach of Contract—Essential Factual Elements. This form is intended for use in most contract disputes. If more specificity is desired, see verdict forms that follow.
The special verdict forms in this section are intended only as models. They may need to be modified depending on the facts of the case.
Optional questions 2 and 3 address acts that the plaintiff must have performed before the defendant’s duty to perform is triggered. Include question 2 if the court has determined that the contract included dependent covenants, such that the failure of the plaintiff to perform some obligation would relieve the defendant of the obligation to perform. (See Brown v. Grimes (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 265, 277–279 [120 Cal.Rptr.3d 893].) Include question 3 if the plaintiff claims that the plaintiff was excused from having to perform an otherwise required obligation.
Optional questions 4 and 5 address conditions precedent to the defendant’s performance. Include question 4 if the occurrence of conditions for performance is at issue. (See CACI No. 322, Occurrence of Agreed Condition Precedent.) Include question 5 if the plaintiff alleges that conditions that did not occur were excused. The most common form of excuse is the defendant’s waiver. (See CACI No. 323, Waiver of Condition Precedent; see also Restatement Second of Contracts, section 225, Comment b.) Waiver must be proved by clear and convincing evidence. (DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe & Takeout III, Ltd. (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 54, 60 [35 Cal.Rptr.2d 515].)
Note that questions 4 and 5 address conditions precedent, not the defendant’s nonperformance after the conditions have all occurred or been excused. The defendant’s nonperformance is the first option for question 6. If the defendant alleges that its nonperformance was excused or waived by the plaintiff, an additional question on excuse or waiver should be included after question 6.
If the verdict form used combines other causes of action involving both economic and noneconomic damages, use “economic” in question 8.
If specificity is not required, users do not have to itemize the damages listed in question 8. The breakdown is optional depending on the circumstances.
If there are multiple causes of action, users may wish to combine the individual forms into one form. If different damages are recoverable on different causes of action, replace the damages tables in all of the verdict forms with CACI No. VF-3920, Damages on Multiple Legal Theories.