CACI 1405 False Arrest With Warrant—Essential Factual Elements
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI
1405 False Arrest With Warrant—Essential Factual Elements
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/nonbinary pronoun] was wrongfully arrested by [name of defendant]. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1.[That [name of defendant] arrested [name of plaintiff];]
[That [name of defendant] intentionally caused [name of plaintiff] to be wrongfully arrested;]
2.That [insert facts supporting the invalidity of the warrant or the unlawfulness of the arrest, e.g., “the warrant for [name of plaintiff]’s arrest had expired”];
3.That [name of plaintiff] was [actually] harmed; and
4.That [name of defendant]’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing [name of plaintiff]’s harm.
New September 2003; Revised December 2011
Directions for Use
CACI No. 1406, False Arrest With Warrant—Peace Officer—Affirmative Defense—“Good-Faith” Exception, should be given after this instruction if that defense is asserted.
If the plaintiff is seeking nominal damages as an alternative to actual damages, insert the following paragraph above element 3:
If you find both of the above, then the law assumes that [name of plaintiff] has been harmed and [he/she/nonbinary pronoun] is entitled to a nominal sum such as one dollar. [Name of plaintiff] is also entitled to additional damages if [he/she/nonbinary pronoun] proves the following:
The second sentence of the above paragraph, along with the final two elements of this instruction, should be omitted if plaintiff is seeking nominal damages only. Read “actually” in the third element only if nominal damages are also being sought.
Sources and Authority
•Penal Code section 834.
•Public Employee Liability for False Arrest. Government Code section 820.4.
•“False arrest and false imprisonment are the same tort. False arrest is a way of committing false imprisonment.” (Cox v. Griffin (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 440, 446, fn. 6 [246 Cal.Rptr.3d 185].)
•“ ‘The action for false imprisonment is frequently alleged to have been committed by reason of some wrongful arrest under some pretended or void order of some court, in which class of false imprisonment cases it is incumbent on the plaintiff to allege facts showing or tending to show that such arrest, under such court procedure, was wrongful, unauthorized and without any probable cause; … .’ ” (Peters v. Bigelow (1934) 137 Cal.App. 135, 139 [30 P.2d 450].)