CACI 4301 Expiration of Fixed-Term Tenancy—Essential Factual Elements
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI
California Civil Jury Instructions CACI
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] [and [name of subtenant], a subtenant of [name of defendant],] no longer [has/have] the right to occupy the property because the [lease/rental agreement/sublease] has ended. To establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1.That [name of plaintiff] [owns/leases] the property;
2.That [name of plaintiff] [leased/subleased] the property to [name of defendant] until [insert end date];
3.That [name of plaintiff] did not give [name of defendant] permission to continue occupying the property after the [lease/rental agreement/sublease] ended; and
4.That [name of defendant] [or subtenant [name of subtenant]] is still occupying the property.
New August 2007; Revised June 2011, May 2020
If the plaintiff is the landlord or owner, select “lease” or “rental agreement” in the first sentence and in element 3 as appropriate, “owns” in element 1, and “leased” in element 2. Commercial documents are usually called “leases” while residential documents are often called “rental agreements.” Select the term that is used on the written document.
If the plaintiff is a tenant seeking to recover possession from a subtenant, select “sublease” in the first paragraph and in element 3, “leases” in element 1, and “subleased” in element 2. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1161(3).)
If persons other than the tenant-defendant are occupying the premises, include the bracketed language in the first paragraph and in element 4.
The Tenant Protection Act of 2019 imposes additional requirements for the termination of a rental agreement for certain residential tenancies. (Civ. Code, § 1946.2(a) [“just cause” requirement for termination of certain residential tenancies], (b) [“just cause” defined].) This instruction should be modified accordingly if applicable.
•Holding Over After Expiration of Lease Term. Code of Civil Procedure section 1161.
•Conversion to Ordinary Civil Action If Possession Not at Issue. Civil Code section 1952.3(a).
•Tenant Protection Act of 2019. Civil Code section 1946.2.
•“ ‘In order that such an action may be maintained the conventional relation of landlord and tenant must be shown to exist. In other words, the action is limited to those cases in which the tenant is estopped to deny the landlord’s title.’ ” (Fredericksen v. McCosker (1956) 143 Cal.App.2d 114, 116 [299 P.2d 908], internal citations omitted.)
•“The most important difference between a periodic tenancy and a tenancy for a fixed term—such as six months—is that the latter terminates at the end of such term, without any requirement of notice as in the former. In order to create an estate for a definite period, the duration must be capable of exact computation when it becomes possessory, otherwise no such estate is created.” (Camp v. Matich (1948) 87 Cal.App.2d 660, 665–666 [197 P.2d 345], internal citations omitted.)
•“It is well established that it is the duty of the tenant as soon as his tenancy expires by its own limitations, to surrender the possession of the premises and that no notice of termination is necessary, the lease itself terminating the tenancy; and if he continues in possession beyond that period without the permission of the landlord, he is guilty of unlawful detainer, and an action may be commenced against him at once, under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure, without the service upon him of any notice.” (Ryland v. Appelbaum (1924) 70 Cal.App. 268, 270 [233 P. 356], internal citations omitted.)
•“If the tenant gives up possession of the property after the commencement of an unlawful detainer proceeding, the action becomes an ordinary one for damages.” (Fish Construction Co. v. Moselle Coach Works, Inc. (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 654, 658 [196 Cal.Rptr. 174].)